Prediction of Daniel De Jonge [] vs Daniel Milavsky [687th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L W W L
Form
W W W W W W W L W LHead-2-Head: Jonge 1 - 0 Milavsky
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jonge winning 2 and Milavsky winning 0. The last match between Jonge and Milavsky was at the M15 Montreal, 13-03-2025, Second, I.hard with Daniel De Jonge getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Daniel De Jonge | 1 |
| Daniel Milavsky | 0 |
| Jonge | Stats | Milavsky |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (20-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 83% (10-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| N/A | Ranking | 687 |
| Highest Rank | 687 | |
| 25 | Age | 23 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 57% (120-92) | Career Total W/L | 71% (30-12) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Daniel Milavsky
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:20:18 | Average Match Time | 1:20:18 |
| 60% (35/58) | 1st Serve % | 62% (34/55) |
| 71% (25/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (22/34) |
| 48% (11/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (8/21) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 45% (25/55) | Return Points Win % | 38% (22/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Daniel De Jonge vs Daniel Milavsky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jonge 1 - 0 Milavsky
Editorial Prediction:
Analyzing the recent form in second serve performance reveals that Milavsky holds an edge, winning 46.89% of points compared to Jonge's 40.25%. Historically, there is a substantial relationship between second serve efficacy and the accuracy of match predictions.
When examining return game statistics, Milavsky also comes out ahead by claiming 50.54% of points against opponents' second serves, while Jonge achieves 48.73%. For first serve returns, Milavsky continues to lead with 25.05% compared to Jonge's 23.06%. These return metrics are instrumental in determining the favored player in head-to-head matchups.
Looking at performance under pressure, Milavsky again outperforms Jonge by saving 55.87% of breakpoints versus Jonge's 54.17%. Breakpoint conversion further highlights a crucial difference, with Jonge converting 40.38% of opportunities compared to Milavsky's 27.27%, which is a pivotal factor for in-game predictions when faced with breakpoint chances.
Their performance overview over the past year shows distinct discrepancies: Jonge has a win rate of 54.35% (25 wins and 21 losses) against Milavsky’s impressive 84.62% (22 wins and 4 losses). This overall winning percentage contributes significantly to head-to-head prediction insights. In terms of the quality of opponents faced, Milavsky has played against competitors with an average rank of 378.12, while Jonge's opponents have been ranked at an average of 343.48, slightly stronger competition on average.
Regarding career surface performance, both players excel on indoor hard courts. Milavsky has a commendable win percentage of 86% (12-2), whereas Jonge records a 64% win rate (21-12) on the same surface. Conversely, their performance on clay surfaces is less favorable for both; Jonge maintains a 53% win rate (54-47) and Milavsky at 50% (2-2).
Both players have predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments over the last year, with Milavsky winning 84.62% of his matches in these events compared to Jonge's 54.35%. The distinction in competition levels plays into predictive analyses, given the variance in event caliber.
Another layer in predicting match outcomes is deciding set performance, where both players have shown consistent success, winning 67% of their deciding sets over the past year. Such statistics are valuable for live predictions and betting insights, particularly if a match extends to the final set.
In summation, based on second serve statistics, return game performance, pressure handling capabilities, and recent win-loss records, Milavsky appears to be the stronger contender and is projected to win this upcoming match. The analysis of current and past performance clearly positions Milavsky as the favorite in this head-to-head encounter.
Daniel De Jonge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Garcian
Player
Daniel De Jonge
47%
(
41 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
55 of
100)
10
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
6
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
98
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Tristan Berard
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Yoshka Sborowsky
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Loann Massard
Player
Daniel De Jonge
60%
(
75 of
126)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
15
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
52 of
75)
55%
(
28 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
46 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
49 of
126)
129
Total Points Won
123
|
7-6(5) 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ismael Soussi
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Evan Jarzaguet
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
3
Aces
13
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joshua Lapadat
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
73 of
107)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Daniel Milavsky
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ronald Hohmann
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Milavsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Daniel Milavsky
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
5
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Attila Boros
69%
(
51 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Daniel Milavsky
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
101)
6
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
101)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Alfredo Perez
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Brian Bozemoj
50%
(
20 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Adam Farag Cao
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
6 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Edward Winter
65%
(
77 of
118)
1st Serve %
61%
(
80 of
131)
17
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
34%
(
40 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
131)
133
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Guillaume Dalmasso
63%
(
76 of
121)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
7
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
8
80%
(
61 of
76)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
45 of
55)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
32%
(
39 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
32 of
102)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Sebastian Gima
63%
(
80 of
128)
1st Serve %
54%
(
67 of
123)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
52 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
54 of
123)
130
Total Points Won
121
|
6-2 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Milavsky
Player
Dan Martin
55%
(
52 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
0
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
37%
(
16 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 2-6 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (120/92) | Win/Loss | 71% (30/12) |
| 55% (255/211) | Sets Win/Loss | 67% (66/33) |
| 52% (2293/2118) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (543/408) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 529 | Aces Total | 144 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 778 | Total Double Faults | 129 |
| 1:6:43 | Average Match Time | 1:19:43 |
| 345.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 306.76 |
| 55% (5029/9204) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1270/2132) |
| 70% (3498/5029) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (918/1270) |
| 45% (1884/4175) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (423/862) |
| 43% (419/980) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (104/229) |
| 41% (3861/9396) | Return Points Win % | 42% (872/2065) |
| 56% (116/208) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 70% (28/40) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (21/41) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (4/11) |
| 55% (26/47) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (8/15) |
| 91% (116/105) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (29/26) |
| 9% (116/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (29/3) |
| 14% (95/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (13/4) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
